A study presented by Sagar Dhara on the proposed H-CITI project around KBR Park concluded that the expected increase in traffic speeds is likely to be temporary. While congestion may initially reduce, increasing vehicle volumes and induced demand (Jevons Paradox) could return traffic to current levels by 2032, after which average speeds may decline below 18 km/h. The study questioned whether the project's estimated ₹1,100 crore cost would achieve its stated objectives. It highlighted significant concerns over increased air pollution, public health risks, and environmental degradation, particularly affecting children and senior citizens. The projected economic cost of health impacts between 2026–2046 was estimated at 86% of the project cost. Concerns were also raised regarding possible implications for the Right to Life and Health (Article 21), inadequate public disclosure of project documents, and the absence of meaningful public consultation. The study recommended placing the project on hold until a comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), consistent with UNEP guidelines, is undertaken with active public participation. It also called for a detailed cost-benefit analysis comparing H-CITI with alternative mobility and traffic management solutions that prioritize reduced emissions and improved public health. Participants broadly endorsed these recommendations, emphasizing sustained citizen engagement, transparency, intergenerational equity, and data-driven urban planning focused on moving people rather than vehicles. Additional suggestions included monitoring walkability, geo-tagging environmental assets, and addressing broader climate and ecological concerns.